Sunday, May 18, 2014


NATIONAL PARTIES AFTER 2014
National Parties in India after the General Elections 2014 are
1.       BHARATHIYA JANATHA PARTY (BJP)
2.       COMMUNIST PARTY OF INDIA (MARXIST) (CPIM)
3.       INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS. (INC)
Detailed discussion is below.

Before the General Elections 2014 there were 6 National Parties in India[i]. They were 


(Courtesy: Wikipedia)
The law that classifies a party as a national, state and other parties is  Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968 (Order of 1968 in short)[ii]. According to the Order of 1968 Paragraph 6A[iii] classify a party as a State Party and Paragraph 6B[iv] as a National Party.  
BSP NCP and CPI lost there status as National Political Parties after there Election. NCP secures only 6 seats, BSP fails to score any and CPI only 1 seat. As per the Order of 1968 none of them qualifies conditions to be a national party. They fails to secure 6% percent of total votes polled, the total seats of the party must atleat 2% of the total seats of  Lok Shaba. All the three party fails to be a state party in four states.
BJP & CONGRESS satisfies the 1st condition of Paragaph 6B of Order of 1698
POSITION OF CPI(M)
At present CPIM need not worry about losing the National party Status as they are now enjoying Conditions (ii) and (iii) of the Order of 1968.
Condition ii
(ii) At the last general election to the House of the People, the party has won at least two percent of the total number of seats in the House of the People, any fraction exceeding half being counted as one; and the party’s candidates have been elected to that House from not less than three States.
CPIM had secured 9 seats out of 543. As per the Condition ii the representation of the Party is to have atleast 2% of total seats. Hence the representation of party is (9/543)%=1.65%. As per the clause any fraction exceeding half being counted as one, hence the 1.65 turns to 2.00%. and have representation from 3 states Kerala, West Bengal and TripuraHence CPIM can retain its status.
Condition iii
iii) The party is recognized as State party in at least four States.
CPIM fulfills the conditions as a state party in four states, viz West Bengal, Kerala, Tripura and Tamil Nadu. One of the condition for becoming a  state party is that the party must got at least 3% of seats in the Legislative Assembly.  In Tamil Nadu out of 234 seats CPIM have 10 seats which comes to 4.3%. Hence it retains the status of National Party.



[iii] 6A. Conditions for recognition as a State Party – Apolitical party shall be eligible for recognition as a State party in a State, if, and only if, any of the following conditions is fulfilled:
(i) At the last general election to the Legislative Assembly of the State, the candidates set up by the party have secured not less than six percent of the total valid votes polled in the State; and, in addition, the party has returned at least two members to the Legislative Assembly of that State at such general election; or
(ii) At the last general election to the House of the People from that State, the candidates set up by the party have secured not less than six percent of the total valid votes polled in the State; and, in addition, the party has returned at least one member to the House of the People from that State at such general election; or
(iii) At the last general election to the Legislative Assembly of the State, the party has won at least three percent of the total number of seats in the Legislative Assembly, (any fraction exceeding half being counted as one), or at least three seats in the Assembly, whichever is more; or
(iv) At the last general election to the House of the People from the State, the party has returned at least one member to the House of the People for every 25 members or any fraction thereof allotted to that State;] or
{(v) At the last general election to the House of the People from the State, or at the last general election to the Legislative Assembly of the State, the candidates set up by the Party have secured not less than eight percent of the total valid votes polled in the State.}
[iv] 6B. Conditions for recognition as a National Party – A political party shall be eligible to be recognized as National party, if, and only if, any of the following conditions is fulfilled:
(i) The candidates set up by the party, in any four or more States, at the last general election to the House of the People, or to the Legislative Assembly of the State concerned, have secured not less than six percent of the total valid votes polled in each of those States at that general election; and, in addition, it has returned at least four members to the House of the People at the aforesaid last general election from any State or States; or
(ii) At the last general election to the House of the People, the party has won at least two percent of the total number of seats in the House of the People, any fraction exceeding half being counted as one; and the party’s candidates have been elected to that House from not less than three States; or
(iii) The party is recognized as State party in at least four States.]

Wednesday, May 7, 2014

How Kerala Defeated in Supreme Court


ISSUES FRAMED BY SUPREME COURT
DECISIONS OF SUPREME COURT
1.
Whether the case against Kerala is maintainable under Constitution of India
Yes, maintainable. The suit filed by the State of Tamil Nadu is maintainable under Article 131 of the Constitution.
Decision in Favor of Tamil Nadu
2.
Whether the case based on a legal right claimed under the lease deed executed between the Government of the Maharaja of Travancore and the Secretary of State for India on 29.10.1886, is
barred by Constitution of India?
The suit based on a legal right claimed under the lease deed executed between the Government of the Maharaja of Travancore and the Secretary of State for India in Council on 29.10.1886 is not barred by the proviso to Article 131 of the Constitution
Decision in Favor of Tamil Nadu
3.
Whether the Kerala is barred from raising the argument that the deed dated 29.10.1886 has lapsed, in view of subsequent  conduct of the Kerala and execution of the supplemental  agreements dated 29.05.1970 accepting the various provisions of the  original Deed dated 29.10.1886
The State of Kerala is barred from raising the argument that the lease deed dated 29.10.1886 has lapsed, in view of the supplemental agreements dated 28.05.1970.
 Decision in Favor of Tamil Nadu

4.
Whether the lease deed executed between the Government of the Maharaja of Travancore and Secretary of State for India on  29.10.1886 is valid, binding on Kerala.
The lease deed executed between the Government of the Maharaja of  Travancore and Secretary of State for India in Council on 29.10.1886 is valid  and binding on Kerala and it is enforceable by Tamil Nadu against Kerala.
Decision in Favor of Tamil Nadu
5.
Whether the Kerala Irrigation and Water Conservation (Amendment) Act 2006 is
unconstitutional and ultra vires, in its application to and effect on the Mullai Periyar Dam?
 (Dam Safety Authority)
Kerala Irrigation and Water Conservation (Amendment) Act, 2006 is  unconstitutional and ultra vires in its application to and effect on the Mullaperiyar dam.
 Decision in Favor of Tamil Nadu
6.
Whether the rights of the Tamil Nad, that the height of dam can be upto 152 feet and so which is obtained in the Judgment dated 27.02.2006 passed by Supreme Court in 2006 can be nullified by a legislation made by the Kerala State Legislature?
The rights of Tamil Nadu, got in the judgment dated 27.2.2006 passed by this Court cannot be nullified by a legislation made by the Kerala State legislature
Decision in Favor of Tamil Nadu
7.
Whether the judgment dated 27.2.2006 of this Court in WP(C) No. 386/2001 operated  as res judicata, in respect of all or any of the defences set up by  the first defendant in its written statement?
The earlier judgment of this Court given on 27.2.2006 operates as res judicata on the issue of the safety of Mullaperiyar dam for raising water level to 142 ft. and ultimately to 152 ft. after completion of further strengthening measures on the Mullaperiyar dam
Decision in Favor of Tamil Nadu
8.
Whether the pleas  relating to validity and binding nature of the deed dated  29.10.1886, the nature of Periyar River, structural safety of Mullai Periyar Dam etc. raised by Kerala in its defence, are finally decided by the judgment of this Court dated  27.2.2006 in WP(C) No.386/2001  and consequently Kerala is barred from raising or reagitating those issues and pleas in this suit, by the principle of res judicata and
constructive res judicata
The plea raised by Kerala relating to the lease deed dated 29.10.1886 and structural safety of Mullaperiyar dam have been finally decided by  the judgment of this Court dated 27.2.2006 and Kerala is barred from
raising or re-agitating these issues in the present suit.
Decision in Favor of Tamil Nadu
9.
Whether the Kerala can obstruct the Tamil Nadu from increasing the water level of Mullai Periyar Dam to 142 ft. and from  carrying out repair works as per the judgment dated 27.2.2006 of this Court in WP(C) No. 386/2001.
Kerala cannot obstruct Tamil Nadu from increasing the water level of Mullaperiyar dam to 142 ft. and from carrying out repair works as per judgment dated 27.2.2006.
Decision in Favor of Tamil Nadu
10.
Whether the Kerala is barred from contending that Periyar River is not an inter-State river
it is held that Kerala cannot be
permitted to contend that river Periyar is an intra-State river. Kerala’s witness M.K. Parameswaran Nair has admitted that in
Chapter LXIII under the heading “Interstate waters” from “Water Resources of  Kerala” published by Public Works Department, Government of Kerala in  1958, Periyar has been mentioned as an inter-State river. This witness also  admits that Water Atlas of Kerala wherein details of Periyar basin are given  shows that part of the basin falls in the neighbouring State of Tamil Nadu
Decision in Favor of Tamil Nadu
11.
Whether the offer of Kerala, to construct a new dam  across River Periyar in the downstream region of Mullai Periyar Dam would meet the ends of justice and requirements of Tamil Nadu.
In this view of the matter for the construction of new dam, there has to be agreement of both the parties. The offer made by Kerala cannot be thrusted upon Tamil Nadu, therefore, has to be decided against
Kerala and it is so held
Decision in Favor of Tamil Nadu



CYBER PORNOGRAPHY IN INDIA
LEGAL OR ILLEGAL[i]
 By Legith T Kottakkal[1]

CONTENTS
1.       Introduction
a.      Crux Of PIL
b.      Opinion Of Authorities.
2.      Part A
a.      Laws Prohibiting Pornography In India
3.      Part B
Chapter 1. Publication Of Obscene Materials
a.      Section 67
b.      Legal Analysis
c.       Punishment For Offences Under Section 67
Chapter 2- Publication Of Sexually Explicit Material (Section 67. A)
a.      Section 67 A
b.      Legal Analysis
c.       Punishment For Offences Under Section 67 A
Chapter 3- Child Pornography
a.      Section 67 B
b.      Legal Analysis
c.       Punishment For Offences Under Section 67 B
4.      Constitutional Right And Information Technology Act
5.      Part C- Conclusion
A.    Watching Porn May Not An Offence Under Section 67 And Section 67a.
B.     Downloading Porn Materials May Be An Offence Under Section 67 And Section 67A.
C.    All Modes Of Child Pornography Is Serious Offence
6.      Tail Piece- Need For Sex Education






  1. INTRODUCTION
There is no settled definition of pornography or obscenity. What is  considered simply sexually explicit but not obscene in USA may well be considered obscene in India. There have been many attempts to limit the  availability of pornographic content on the Internet by governments and  law enforcement bodies all around the world but with little effect. Hence the websites registered outside India can well accesable in India. Sometimes one mans pornography is other man’s artPornography is now well accessable after the wide spread of internet worldwide. The offences related to pornography and related are increasing day by day. The demand for banning pornographic websites get national notice when a public interest litigation was moved before the Supreme Court of India seeking a total ban on such sites.
The crux of the PIL-
The petition has demanded an amendment to the IT Act so as to make pornography on computer or mobile a crime, attracting severe punishment to the producers, distributors and viewers of such sites. The petitioners have blamed cyber porn for what they claim growing problems of psycho-physical nature, including sexually transmitted diseases and sexual deformities among others.  The mater is now subjudice.
Opinion of Authorities
The Supreme Court issued notices to various ministries as well as service providers. The Government of India had made it clear that a clear cut and absolute ban on porn sites is impposible and would cause greater harm to the society. The service providers like Google etc had made it clear that without a poisitive direction from the competent authority they are not in a position to ban all the porn sites as it may affet the contractual rights and entail them in a serious legal battle. The final order of Supreme Court is yet to come. Lets us discuss the present situations regarding the implications and legal consequences of the cyber pornography in India.

PART A
PORNOGRAPHY ILLEGAL IN INDIA
  1. Laws prohibiting Pornography in India.
Indian law penalizing cyber Pornography are
a.       Information Technology Act 2000
b.      Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act and
c.       The Indian  Penal Code
Here in this blog only offences under Information Technology act is dealt with because it only deals with the cyber pornography or pornography in electronic format. The rest Acts deals with the pornography in other modes.
PART B
OFFENCES -INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT 2000
Under IT Act 2000 three offences are listed they are
1.  Publication of Obscene materials
2. Publication of Sexually explicit material
3. Child pronography

CHAPTER 1
PUBLICATION OF OBSCENE MATERIALS.
Section 67 Punishment for publishing or transmitting obscene material in electronic form[ii]
LEGAL ANALYSIS
There are three main ingredients under Section 67 to attracts an offence.  Under Section 67 these three incrediants together constitutes an offence that is to say if any one of the incrediants is lacking then its not an offence. The three incrediants are
a.       publishes or transmits or causes to be published in the electronic form
b.      any material  which is lascivious or appeals to the prurient interest or if its effect is such as to tend to deprave and  corrupt persons who are likely, having regard to all relevant circumstances,
c.        to read, see or hear the  matter contained or embodied in it.
By the analysis of the ingredients to constitute an offence a person must publish or transmit the same and the material must be of such a nature that satisfies the above point (b) with an intention to read, see or hear the material. If any of the ingredients is lacking then offence is not attracted.
PUNISHMENT FOR THE OFFENCE COMMITED UNDER SECTION 67
If a person is commiting the offence for the first time then
imprisonment of either for a term which may extend to two three years and with fine which may extend to five lakh rupees
If a person is commiting the offence for the second or subsequent  time then
imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years and also with fine which may extend to ten lakh rupees.

CHAPTER 2
PUBLICATION OF SEXUALLY EXPLICIT MATERIAL (SECTION 67. A)

Initially during the enactment of Information technology Act in 2000 originaly Section 67 was incorporated but in course of time the misuse of electronic forms to carry sexually explicit materials and child pornography increased and necessitated the parliament to amend the Act in 2008 to include Section 67A and 67 B
Section 67 A Punishment for publishing or transmitting of material containing sexually explicit  act,etc. in electronic form[iii]
LEGAL ANALYSIS
There are only two incredients to constitute the offence. They are
a.       Whoever publishes or transmits or causes to be published or transmitted in the electronic form
b.      any material which contains sexually explicit act or conduct
Any action of sexual nature if it is published or transmitted is punishable under the Act.
PUNISHMENT FOR THE OFFENCE COMMITED UNDER SECTION 67 A
If a person is committing the offence for the first time then
imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years and with fine which may  extend to ten lakh rupees
If a person is commiting the offence for the second or subsequent  time then
imprisonment of  either description for a term which may extend to seven years and also with fine which may extend  to ten lakh rupees
CHAPTER 3
CHILD PORNOGRAPHY
Even browsing or seeking for Child pornography in India is totally illegal. In February 2009, the Parliament of India passed the Information Technology Bill," banning the creation and transmission of child pornography. Strict actions are taken by various authorites against the child abuse. Child is a person who is not completed an age of 18. Section 67 B deals with the various types of the child poronography and child abuses through the cyber world and in electronic form.
LEGAL ANALYSIS
Section 67 B Punishment for publishing or transmitting of material depicting children in sexually explicit act, etc. in electronic form[iv]
Five grounds are enumerated under this section. Each itself constitutes an offence. apart from the incrediants of Section 67 and Section 67 A this Section includes the following acts are offence
a.       online relationship with a child so as to offend the child’s morality
b.      facilitates abusing children online
c.       records in any electronic form own abuse or that of others pertaining to sexually explicit act with children
This section is different from Section 67 and 67 A mainly on the ground that even search for pornographic materials involving children is an offence. Thus if a person creates text or digital images, collects, seeks, browses, downloads, advertises,  promotes, exchanges or distributes material in any electronic form is punishable under this act.
PUNISHMENT FOR THE OFFENCE COMMITED UNDER SECTION 67 B
If a person is committing the offence for the first time then
imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years and with fine which may  extend to ten lakh rupees
If a person is commiting the offence for the second or subsequent  time then
imprisonment of  either description for a term which may extend to seven years and also with fine which may extend  to ten lakh rupees
Thus it is categorically clear that pornography is offence in India and is punishable with harsh sentence compared to other offences. 
4. CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT
Constitution guarantees the fundamental right of freedom of speech and  expression[v], it has been held that a law against obscenity is constitutional. The Supreme Court has defined obscene as “offensive to modesty or decency; lewd, filthy, repulsive.
Part C
Conclusion
A.    Watching Porn May not an offence under Section 67 and Section 67A.
The ingredient which constitutes an offence under Section 67 and 67 A is publishes or transmits or causes to be publish
a.       obscene material in electronic form (Section 67)
b.      material containing sexually explicit  act, etc.(Section 67 A)
here the incrediants is publishes or transmit to publish. The offence is attracted against a person who publishes or transmit it through electronic form. Mere watching does not involves any of the offence. at the same time seeking or browsing also is not an offence under Section 67 and Section 67 A. another point is that by mere watchin a person is not reducing the material into an electronic form[vi]. Here there is no deliberate act of keeing the material in electronic form. The general law states that a person cannot be penalized without a positive law. Here the act specifically prohibits the publish and transmission only. Mere watching or viewing or browsing does not constitute an offence.
B.     Downloading Porn Materials may be an offence under Section 67 and Section 67A.
Download a material is a deliberate act and not an accidental one. It requires intention to possess the material as his own in an electronic form. While downloading a material one is it to an electronic form. It is as if participating in the offence of publishing or transmitting. If the act is given a liberal interpretation then downloading materials is an offence. No one is permitted to keep a thing which is offensive. When downloading a material a person is keeping with him an offensive material. Like keeping a dangerous weapon or material even without use is an offence, like that keeping a material with a person can attract punishment.
C.    All modes of Child Pornography is Serious offence
Mere watching, creates text or digital images, collects, seeks, browses, downloads, advertises,  promotes, exchanges or distributes material in any electronic form depicting  children in obscene or indecent or sexually explicit manner is an offence. online relationship with an intention to abuse a child is offence.
TAIL PIECE*- NEED FOR SEX EDUCATION
Mere banning the porn sites is like curing for the symptoms and not for the disease. The increase in viewing porn sites is only a symptom of lack of sex education which is the disease. The need for the sex education at the right spirit and in correct perspective is the need for the society than to debating on ban of porn sites. If a person is given sex education then the use of porn films and all will automatically be reduced. In our society sex education still consider it as a taboo. Correct knowledge and right wisdom keeps a man upright. Let the state provide the same.
Sex education is necessary
a.       to reduce the risk of certain sexual behaviors and
b.      to equip individuals to make informed decisions about their personal sexual activity.
c.       to liberate themselves from socially organized sexual oppression and to make up their own minds.
d.      For open dialogue about physical intimacy and health education can generate more self-esteem, self-confidence, humor, and general health.
“THE HEALTH AND WEALTH OF THE NATION LIES IN THE HEALTH OF YOUNG GENERATIONS”


[1] Author is a practicing lawyer at High Court of Kerala



[i] Disclaimer:- Any or all views or opinions presented in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the general law of the land. This article is only meant for academic discussions and thought sharing.  The views made herein are only the opinion of the author that may be true of false and never advises a person to act upon the thoughts presented in the article. This article is not intended to provide any legal advice or analysis. The author or the article has no responsibility if a person acted upon the thoughts shared in the article. This article is intended only for any academic purposes and in no way or means encourage or support the use of porn websites by any individual.
[ii] 67).  Punishment for publishing or transmitting obscene material in electronic form  (Amended vide ITAA 2008)

Whoever publishes or transmits or causes to be published in the electronic form, any material  which is lascivious or appeals to the prurient interest or if its effect is such as to tend to deprave and  corrupt persons who are likely, having regard to all relevant circumstances, to read, see or hear the  matter contained or embodied in it, shall be punished on first conviction with imprisonment of either  description for a term which may extend to two three years and with fine which may extend to five  lakh rupees and in the event of a second or subsequent conviction with imprisonment of either  description for a term which may extend to five years and also with fine which may extend to ten lakh rupees.
[iii] 67 A Punishment for publishing or transmitting of material containing sexually explicit  act,etc. in electronic form (Inserted vide ITAA 2008)
Whoever publishes or transmits or causes to be published or transmitted in the electronic form  any material which contains sexually explicit act or conduct shall be punished on first conviction with  imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years and with fine which may  extend to ten lakh rupees and in the event of second or subsequent conviction with imprisonment of  either description for a term which may extend to seven years and also with fine which may extend  to ten lakh rupees.
 Exception: This section and section 67 does not extend to any book, pamphlet, paper, writing,  drawing, painting, representation or figure in electronic form-
(i) the publication of which is proved to be justified as being for the public good on the  ground that such book, pamphlet, paper, writing, drawing, painting, representation or  figure is in the interest of science,literature,art,or learning or other objects of general  concern; or
(ii) which is kept or used bona fide for religious purposes.
[iv] 67 B Punishment for publishing or transmitting of material depicting children in sexually explicit act, etc. in electronic form.
 Whoever,-
(a) publishes or transmits or causes to be published or transmitted material in any  electronic form which depicts children engaged in sexually explicit act or conduct or
(b) creates text or digital images, collects, seeks, browses, downloads, advertises, promotes, exchanges or distributes material in any electronic form depicting children in obscene or indecent or sexually explicit manner or
(c) cultivates, entices or induces children to online relationship with one or more children for and on sexually explicit act or in a manner that may offend a  reasonable adult on the computer resource or
(d) facilitates abusing children online or
(e) records in any electronic form own abuse or that of others pertaining to  sexually explicit act with children,

shall be punished on first conviction with imprisonment of either description for a term which  may extend to five years and with a fine which may extend to ten lakh rupees and in the event of second or subsequent conviction with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend  to seven years and also with fine which may extend to ten lakh rupees:

Provided that the provisions of section 67, section 67A and this section does not extend to any  book, pamphlet, paper, writing, drawing, painting, representation or figure in electronic form-
(i) The publication of which is proved to be justified as being for the public good on the  ground that such book, pamphlet, paper writing, drawing, painting, representation or  figure is in the interest of science, literature, art or learning or other objects of general  concern; or
(ii) which is kept or used for bonafide heritage or religious purposes

Explanation: For the purposes of this section, "children" means a person who has not  completed the age of 18 years.
[v] Article 19 (a) of Constitution of India 1950.
[vi]  Section 2(r) of Information Technology Act 2000 "Electronic Form" with reference to information means any information generated, sent, received or stored in media, magnetic, optical, computer memory, micro film, computer generated micro fiche or similar device.